Then
it happened, as they continued on and talked, that suddenly a chariot of fire appeared with horses of fire, and
separated the two of them; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. (2nd Kings 2:11)
Though there was no explicit mention of Enoch going to
Heaven, the same cannot be said of Elijah. Here he is clearly described as
going there. But I believe there are grounds for not assuming he went into the
presence of God. The following occurrences of ‘heaven’ in the Old
Testament are worth considering.
Therefore
may God give you of the dew of heaven, of the fatness of the earth, and plenty
of grain and wine. (Genesis 27:28)
When Isaac pronounced this blessing upon Jacob was he
really asking for dew that came from the presence of God or from the sky? A
similar question can be asked of the next verse.
Then
Israel shall dwell in safety, the fountain of Jacob alone, in a land of grain
and new wine; his heavens shall also drop dew. (Deuteronomy 33:28)
The heaven from which dew comes is presumably the same
heaven from which we ‘receive’ our weather, making it the home of whirlwinds
also. As such, it is not difficult to contemplate that the Bible is really
telling us that Elijah went up by a whirlwind into the sky.
The record of Jesus’ ascension in the Acts of the
Apostles further supports this.
Now when He
had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken up, and a cloud
received Him out of their sight. And while they looked steadfastly toward
heaven as He went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel, who also
said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus,
who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw
Him go into heaven.” (Acts 1:9-11)
Did
the apostles watch Jesus ascend all the way ‘into’ Heaven, the abode of God? Is that possible? Jesus ‘passed through
the heavens’ (Hebrews 4:14) so such a feat of eyesight would be impressive.
The Greek
word for ‘sky’ or ‘heaven’ - οὐρανὸν (ouranon) - is used four times in Acts 1:10-11. It would
therefore seem more straightforward to translate the word as ‘sky’ in this
context (as the NASB and NIV have it). The apostles were evidently staring in
the direction of the sky.
The
Hebrew word that is translated as ‘heaven’ in the verse that describes
Elijah’s ascension (2nd Kings 2:11) is שמים (SHAMAYIM). As with its Greek
counterpart, it can also translate as ‘sky’. Elijah was travelling in the same direction
as Jesus would go – towards the sky. Elisha would have been staring in the same
direction as the disciples would stare.
The
Bible explicitly states where Jesus was going – ‘through the heavens’
and into ‘the presence of God’
(Hebrews 9:24). It does not do the same for Elijah. It does not say that he went into the
presence of God. Furthermore, where would his physical body have gone if Heaven
were the domain of immaterial souls? The generally accepted view is that a
saint goes to Heaven in immaterial form (soul/spirit) so the Elijah conundrum
at least suggests that modification of this view is necessary.
We are not told that Elijah remained where he went. We
do not come to the conclusion that an airplane transports people to the sky (or
‘heaven’) never to return. But have we come to this conclusion about Elijah
simply because the word ‘heaven’ is used – a word that also means ‘sky’?
My understanding is that Elijah had to be removed from
the sight of all who knew him (effectively everyone in Israel, considering his
notoriety) so that Elisha could take up his mantle.
And
so it was, when they had crossed over, that Elijah said to Elisha, “Ask! What
may I do for you, before I am taken away from you?” Elisha said, “Please let a
double portion of your spirit be upon me.” So he said, “You have asked a hard
thing. Nevertheless, if you see
me when I am taken from you, it
shall be so for you; but if not, it shall not be so.” (2nd
Kings 2:9-10)
Elijah was miraculously taken out of the way for Elisha’s sake! The transportation
was confirmation to God’s new chosen prophet that a double portion of Elijah’s
spirit would be his. To borrow an expression from elsewhere in Scripture,
Elijah must decrease while Elisha must increase. Does our potential
misinterpretation of Elijah’s destination distract us from a more important
character?
I believe so. And I further believe that this kind of
error is repeated in a much more dangerous manner within orthodox Christian
teaching when the belief of our souls going to Heaven distracts us from what
ought to be the believer’s focus: future resurrection.
No comments:
Post a Comment