Part 3: What is the soul? (iii) 1st Thessalonians 5:23



Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. (1st Thessalonians 5:23)

The potential for biblical expressions being figurative should not be underestimated here also. If Paul were underlining a doctrine on the nature of man when writing to the Thessalonians it begs the question why the following verse is not viewed in the same way.

For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. (Hebrews 4:12)

If 1st Thessalonians 5:23 confirms that man is a tripartite being then why does Hebrews 4:12 not confirm that he is, in fact, more than that? Even if one were to argue that ‘joints’ and ‘marrow’ are one single part (the body), the ‘heart’ is presented as having ‘thoughts and intents’. It can hardly be the physical heart then. So why is ‘heart’ distinguished from ‘soul’ and ‘spirit’? Following the logic which is used to deduce a doctrine from 1st Thessalonians 5:23 I can therefore redefine that doctrine with Hebrews 4:12 – man has at least four constituent parts: body (divided into joints and marrow), soul, spirit and heart.
But such logic would also be challenged when encountering the following verse:

‘And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ This is the first commandment. (Mark 12:30)

I tend to think that all of the above verses contain expressions that convey the idea of the ‘complete being’. Which of the verses loses their significance when interpreted in such a way? I do not believe that 1st Thessalonians 5:23 is done any disservice when understood like this. The entire entity ought to be sanctified by God. The entire entity is known by God in the tiniest detail. The entire entity should love God. This, to me, is the inherent theology of the verse – no composition of man can be read into it without having God’s Word contradict itself. 

In fact, there is an even more obvious reason why 1st Thessalonians 5:23 is not detailing the composition of a man. In the context, ‘you’ does not refer to any individual but rather the corporate group of saints in Thessalonica.

And we urge you, brethren, to recognize those who labour among you, and are over you in the Lord and admonish you, and to esteem them very highly in love for their work’s sake. Be at peace among yourselves. Now we exhort you, brethren, warn those who are unruly, comfort the fainthearted, uphold the weak, be patient with all. See that no one renders evil for evil to anyone, but always pursue what is good both for yourselves and for all. Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you. Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies. Test all things; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil. Blessing and AdmonitioNow may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He who calls you is faithful, who also will do it. Brethren, pray for us. (1st Thessalonians 5:12-25)

Therefore when Paul refers to ‘your’ spirit, soul and body, he is talking to a single group of people, but this group nonetheless possesses only one spirit, soul and body. They are one body, one spirit and one soul. The unity of these saints in their quest to please God ought to be the main thought of the verse. To use the verse to teach about a single man’s composition is to derail the apostle’s train of thought.

No comments:

Post a Comment